To Those That Might Know >

I may have stuck my foot in it myself, so, if so, silly me!
Back when the iPad was released I was musing with a code developer about possibilities of an actual FMinc application on the both iPhone/iPad platforms and the comment was made the technology for the platforms was the same and difference was more in scaling and perhaps some horsepower processing performance.
In light of the fact that I have some apps, and database apps at that, that download and run on both platforms, I of course shot my mouth off to several clients in promoting the platforms and software.
Now I have a couple of clients who are asking what is the difference between iPhone/iPad Filemaker software, other than scale and perhaps performance, that warrants double the price or even any second platform price at all.
I have read the FM Go white paper and release notes and have not detected any significant differences to relate back to my clients.

Does anyone know of any specific differences in the capabilities in FM Go between the iPhone/iPad platforms that speaks to the price difference?

TIA
--
ForNow
DigitEL

The iPad version doesn't require you to totally redesign _all_ your layouts!

_That's_ gotta be worth an extra twenty bucks, right?

::-)

--
Jonathan Fletcher
jonathan@[Protected]
www.fletcherdata.com
502-509-7137

On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:57 PM, DigitEL <digidigitize@[Protected]> wrote:

> To Those That Might Know >
>
> I may have stuck my foot in it myself, so, if so, silly me!
> Back when the iPad was released I was musing with a code developer about possibilities of an actual FMinc application on the both iPhone/iPad platforms and the comment was made the technology for the platforms was the same and difference was more in scaling and perhaps some horsepower processing performance.
> In light of the fact that I have some apps, and database apps at that, that download and run on both platforms, I of course shot my mouth off to several clients in promoting the platforms and software.
> Now I have a couple of clients who are asking what is the difference between iPhone/iPad Filemaker software, other than scale and perhaps performance, that warrants double the price or even any second platform price at all.
> I have read the FM Go white paper and release notes and have not detected any significant differences to relate back to my clients.
>
> Does anyone know of any specific differences in the capabilities in FM Go between the iPhone/iPad platforms that speaks to the price difference?
>
> TIA
> --
> ForNow
> DigitEL

Jonathan >

Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may like that!
I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the software ;-)
Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480 resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk, table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form factors?

--
ForNow
DigitEL


On Jul 30, 2010, at 9:01 PM, Jonathan Fletcher wrote:

> The iPad version doesn't require you to totally redesign _all_ your layouts!
>
> _That's_ gotta be worth an extra twenty bucks, right?
>
> ::-)
>
> --
> Jonathan Fletcher
> jonathan@[Protected]
> www.fletcherdata.com
> 502-509-7137
>
> On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:57 PM, DigitEL <digidigitize@[Protected]> wrote:
>
>> To Those That Might Know >
>>
>> I may have stuck my foot in it myself, so, if so, silly me!
>> Back when the iPad was released I was musing with a code developer about possibilities of an actual FMinc application on the both iPhone/iPad platforms and the comment was made the technology for the platforms was the same and difference was more in scaling and perhaps some horsepower processing performance.
>> In light of the fact that I have some apps, and database apps at that, that download and run on both platforms, I of course shot my mouth off to several clients in promoting the platforms and software.
>> Now I have a couple of clients who are asking what is the difference between iPhone/iPad Filemaker software, other than scale and perhaps performance, that warrants double the price or even any second platform price at all.
>> I have read the FM Go white paper and release notes and have not detected any significant differences to relate back to my clients.
>>
>> Does anyone know of any specific differences in the capabilities in FM Go between the iPhone/iPad platforms that speaks to the price difference?
>>
>> TIA
>> --
>> ForNow
>> DigitEL

Hmmm...

Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to end up with icons the size of picture frames...

Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.

The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in future.

I think you are always going to have to design differently for different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see a reason that the apps should have different prices for different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...

Steve


On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:

> Jonathan >
>
> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may like that!
> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the software ;-)
> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480 resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk, table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form factors?
>
> --
> ForNow
> DigitEL

My response was just a little bit tongue-in-cheek. The two programs are likely nearly identical, code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will instantly just work on the iPad as well.

I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel like they can charge more. IMHO.

That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled that it's not $99!!!

j.


On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:

> Hmmm...
>
> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>
> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>
> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in future.
>
> I think you are always going to have to design differently for different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see a reason that the apps should have different prices for different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>
> Steve
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>
>> Jonathan >
>>
>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may like that!
>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the software ;-)
>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480 resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk, table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form factors?
>>
>> --
>> ForNow
>> DigitEL
>
>
> --
>
>

--
Jonathan Fletcher
FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer

Fletcher Data Consulting
jonathan@[Protected]
http://www.fletcherdata.com
502-509-7137


Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
Blog: http://kyfmp.com
Next meeting:
8/12/10 1:00 pm

Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be brilliant...


Regards,

Agnes Riley
FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer

http://www.zerobluetech.com
T 201-293-5828

Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
Member, FileMaker Technical Network


> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>
> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel like they can charge more. IMHO.
>
> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled that it's not $99!!!
>
> j.
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>
>> Hmmm...
>>
>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>
>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>
>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in future.
>>
>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see a reason that the apps should have different prices for different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>
>>> Jonathan >
>>>
>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may like that!
>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the software ;-)
>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480 resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk, table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form factors?
>>>
>>> --
>>> ForNow
>>> DigitEL
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jonathan Fletcher
> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>
> Fletcher Data Consulting
> jonathan@[Protected]
> http://www.fletcherdata.com
> 502-509-7137
>
>
> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
> Next meeting:
> 8/12/10 1:00 pm

Feature request!!!


On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:

> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be brilliant...
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Agnes Riley
> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>
> http://www.zerobluetech.com
> T 201-293-5828
>
> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>
>
>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>
>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel like they can charge more. IMHO.
>>
>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled that it's not $99!!!
>>
>> j.
>>
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm...
>>>
>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>
>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>
>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in future.
>>>
>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see a reason that the apps should have different prices for different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may like that!
>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the software ;-)
>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480 resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk, table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form factors?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ForNow
>>>> DigitEL
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Fletcher
>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>
>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>> jonathan@[Protected]
>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>> 502-509-7137
>>
>>
>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>> Next meeting:
>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>

--
Jonathan Fletcher
FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer

Fletcher Data Consulting
jonathan@[Protected]
http://www.fletcherdata.com
502-509-7137


Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
Blog: http://kyfmp.com
Next meeting:
8/12/10 1:00 pm

I think the feature request would not go to FileMaker, Inc. But rather to the VOIP app manufacturers. The problem would be though how to choose which app to send the request to (although, at this point I have none). I do not see this whole thing very unlikely, though, especially with the multitasking on iPad coming up.

Regards,

Agnes Riley
FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer

http://www.zerobluetech.com
T 201-293-5828

Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
Member, FileMaker Technical Network




On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Fletcher <lists@[Protected]> wrote:

> Feature request!!!
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>
>> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be brilliant...
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Agnes Riley
>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>
>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>> T 201-293-5828
>>
>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>
>>
>>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>>
>>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel like they can charge more. IMHO.
>>>
>>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled that it's not $99!!!
>>>
>>> j.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmmm...
>>>>
>>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>>
>>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>>
>>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in future.
>>>>
>>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see a reason that the apps should have different prices for different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may like that!
>>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the software ;-)
>>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480 resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk, table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form factors?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ForNow
>>>>> DigitEL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>
>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>> 502-509-7137
>>>
>>>
>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>> Next meeting:
>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jonathan Fletcher
> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>
> Fletcher Data Consulting
> jonathan@[Protected]
> http://www.fletcherdata.com
> 502-509-7137
>
>
> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
> Next meeting:
> 8/12/10 1:00 pm

On FileMaker Pro I use the webviewer to dial a phonenumber (skype) -
didn't go into too much detail yet on FM GO specs but surely worth a
try, ..
On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:36, Agnes Riley wrote:

> I think the feature request would not go to FileMaker, Inc. But
> rather to the VOIP app manufacturers. The problem would be though
> how to choose which app to send the request to (although, at this
> point I have none). I do not see this whole thing very unlikely,
> though, especially with the multitasking on iPad coming up.
>
> Regards,
>
> Agnes Riley
> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>
> http://www.zerobluetech.com
> T 201-293-5828
>
> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Fletcher <lists@[Protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Feature request!!!
>>
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>
>>> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another
>>> app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be
>>> brilliant...
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Agnes Riley
>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>
>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>
>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>
>>>
>>>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone
>>>> capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will
>>>> instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>>>
>>>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and
>>>> indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel like
>>>> they can charge more. IMHO.
>>>>
>>>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been
>>>> asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled that
>>>> it's not $99!!!
>>>>
>>>> j.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm...
>>>>>
>>>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to
>>>>> end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>>>
>>>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if it
>>>>> were, it would mean that everything on your layout would have to
>>>>> be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>>>
>>>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen
>>>>> for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have hundreds.
>>>>> Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad and
>>>>> touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in future.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for
>>>>> different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see a
>>>>> reason that the apps should have different prices for different
>>>>> sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>>>
>>>>> Steve
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may
>>>>>> like that!
>>>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the
>>>>>> software ;-)
>>>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480
>>>>>> resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething monitors
>>>>>> and have been very appreciative of the genius of Nashoba design
>>>>>> providing the zoom widget without FM charging extra for the
>>>>>> ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for each zoom
>>>>>> increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology being
>>>>>> scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk, table,
>>>>>> and other sized models in between. Does it seem reasonable to
>>>>>> scale up the price for each of these form factors?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ForNow
>>>>>> DigitEL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This list is a free service of LassoSoft: http://
>>>>> www.LassoSoft.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>
>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>> Next meeting:
>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Browse/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Fletcher
>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>
>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>> jonathan@[Protected]
>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>> 502-509-7137
>>
>>
>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>> Next meeting:
>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm

For FM I made a plug-in to dial through Skype, but, of course, plug-in cannot be used on FM Go.

Regards,

Agnes Riley
FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer

http://www.zerobluetech.com
T 201-293-5828

Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
Member, FileMaker Technical Network


On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:44 AM, "info@[Protected]" <info@[Protected]> wrote:

> On FileMaker Pro I use the webviewer to dial a phonenumber (skype) - didn't go into too much detail yet on FM GO specs but surely worth a try, ..
> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:36, Agnes Riley wrote:
>
>> I think the feature request would not go to FileMaker, Inc. But rather to the VOIP app manufacturers. The problem would be though how to choose which app to send the request to (although, at this point I have none). I do not see this whole thing very unlikely, though, especially with the multitasking on iPad coming up.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Agnes Riley
>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>
>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>> T 201-293-5828
>>
>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Fletcher <lists@[Protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Feature request!!!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be brilliant...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>
>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>
>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel like they can charge more. IMHO.
>>>>>
>>>>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled that it's not $99!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> j.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmm...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in future.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see a reason that the apps should have different prices for different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may like that!
>>>>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the software ;-)
>>>>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480 resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk, table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form factors?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> ForNow
>>>>>>> DigitEL
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>
>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>
>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>> 502-509-7137
>>>
>>>
>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>> Next meeting:
>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm

I understand but you can get FM Pro to dial Skype merely by using a
simple web viewer an script, ..
simply set a field (global) to a specific value,

something like this, ..

Let([tel=Filter(AdrCom::contact;"0123456789+")];
"callto:"&tel)

this field is displayed in web viewer window (1px by 1px)
this should trigger yr Skype app

tested on windows computers using fm 9, 10 and 11)


On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:58, Agnes Riley wrote:

> For FM I made a plug-in to dial through Skype, but, of course, plug-
> in cannot be used on FM Go.
>
> Regards,
>
> Agnes Riley
> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>
> http://www.zerobluetech.com
> T 201-293-5828
>
> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:44 AM, "info@[Protected]"
> <info@[Protected]> wrote:
>
>> On FileMaker Pro I use the webviewer to dial a phonenumber (skype)
>> - didn't go into too much detail yet on FM GO specs but surely
>> worth a try, ..
>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:36, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>
>>> I think the feature request would not go to FileMaker, Inc. But
>>> rather to the VOIP app manufacturers. The problem would be though
>>> how to choose which app to send the request to (although, at this
>>> point I have none). I do not see this whole thing very unlikely,
>>> though, especially with the multitasking on iPad coming up.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Agnes Riley
>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>
>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>
>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Fletcher <lists@[Protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Feature request!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another
>>>>> app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be
>>>>> brilliant...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>
>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone
>>>>>> capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will
>>>>>> instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and
>>>>>> indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel
>>>>>> like they can charge more. IMHO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been
>>>>>> asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled
>>>>>> that it's not $99!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> j.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmmm...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to
>>>>>>> end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if
>>>>>>> it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would
>>>>>>> have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen
>>>>>>> for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have
>>>>>>> hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad
>>>>>>> and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in
>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for
>>>>>>> different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see
>>>>>>> a reason that the apps should have different prices for
>>>>>>> different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may
>>>>>>>> like that!
>>>>>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the
>>>>>>>> software ;-)
>>>>>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480
>>>>>>>> resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething
>>>>>>>> monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of
>>>>>>>> Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging
>>>>>>>> extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for
>>>>>>>> each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>>>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology
>>>>>>>> being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk,
>>>>>>>> table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem
>>>>>>>> reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form
>>>>>>>> factors?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> ForNow
>>>>>>>> DigitEL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This list is a free service of LassoSoft: http://
>>>>> www.LassoSoft.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>
>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>> Next meeting:
>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Browse/

Nice touch on that one, infortica.
I was using the callto function with Skype for a long time, but always in connection with Applescript. Now, Applescript not being supported on iPad will become an issue for that solution to work. You way is more elegant. Good one.



On Jul 31, 2010, at 1:27 PM, info@[Protected] wrote:

> I understand but you can get FM Pro to dial Skype merely by using a
> simple web viewer an script, ..
> simply set a field (global) to a specific value,
>
> something like this, ..
>
> Let([tel=Filter(AdrCom::contact;"0123456789+")];
> "callto:"&tel)
>
> this field is displayed in web viewer window (1px by 1px)
> this should trigger yr Skype app
>
> tested on windows computers using fm 9, 10 and 11)
>
>
> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:58, Agnes Riley wrote:
>
>> For FM I made a plug-in to dial through Skype, but, of course, plug-
>> in cannot be used on FM Go.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Agnes Riley
>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>
>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>> T 201-293-5828
>>
>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:44 AM, "info@[Protected]"
>> <info@[Protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On FileMaker Pro I use the webviewer to dial a phonenumber (skype)
>>> - didn't go into too much detail yet on FM GO specs but surely
>>> worth a try, ..
>>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:36, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think the feature request would not go to FileMaker, Inc. But
>>>> rather to the VOIP app manufacturers. The problem would be though
>>>> how to choose which app to send the request to (although, at this
>>>> point I have none). I do not see this whole thing very unlikely,
>>>> though, especially with the multitasking on iPad coming up.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>
>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>
>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Fletcher <lists@[Protected]
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Feature request!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another
>>>>>> app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be
>>>>>> brilliant...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone
>>>>>>> capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will
>>>>>>> instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and
>>>>>>> indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel
>>>>>>> like they can charge more. IMHO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been
>>>>>>> asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled
>>>>>>> that it's not $99!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> j.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmmm...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to
>>>>>>>> end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if
>>>>>>>> it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would
>>>>>>>> have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen
>>>>>>>> for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have
>>>>>>>> hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad
>>>>>>>> and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in
>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for
>>>>>>>> different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see
>>>>>>>> a reason that the apps should have different prices for
>>>>>>>> different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may
>>>>>>>>> like that!
>>>>>>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the
>>>>>>>>> software ;-)
>>>>>>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480
>>>>>>>>> resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething
>>>>>>>>> monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of
>>>>>>>>> Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging
>>>>>>>>> extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for
>>>>>>>>> each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology
>>>>>>>>> being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk,
>>>>>>>>> table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem
>>>>>>>>> reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form
>>>>>>>>> factors?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> ForNow
>>>>>>>>> DigitEL
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> This list is a free service of LassoSoft: http://
>>>>>> www.LassoSoft.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>
>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Browse/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>

Your Frequent FM Talker
Pavle Ancevski Pajo
New York Hotel Trades Council
fmtalk@[Protected]

My plug-In, aside from dialing out, shows Skype user status, as well as receives incoming calls in FileMaker. It is still in beta though. :-)

Regards,

Agnes Riley
FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer

http://www.zerobluetech.com
T 201-293-5828

Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
Member, FileMaker Technical Network


On Aug 2, 2010, at 9:58 AM, FM Talk <fmtalk@[Protected]> wrote:

> Nice touch on that one, infortica.
> I was using the callto function with Skype for a long time, but always in connection with Applescript. Now, Applescript not being supported on iPad will become an issue for that solution to work. You way is more elegant. Good one.
>
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2010, at 1:27 PM, info@[Protected] wrote:
>
>> I understand but you can get FM Pro to dial Skype merely by using a
>> simple web viewer an script, ..
>> simply set a field (global) to a specific value,
>>
>> something like this, ..
>>
>> Let([tel=Filter(AdrCom::contact;"0123456789+")];
>> "callto:"&tel)
>>
>> this field is displayed in web viewer window (1px by 1px)
>> this should trigger yr Skype app
>>
>> tested on windows computers using fm 9, 10 and 11)
>>
>>
>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:58, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>
>>> For FM I made a plug-in to dial through Skype, but, of course, plug-
>>> in cannot be used on FM Go.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Agnes Riley
>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>
>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>
>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:44 AM, "info@[Protected]"
>>> <info@[Protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On FileMaker Pro I use the webviewer to dial a phonenumber (skype)
>>>> - didn't go into too much detail yet on FM GO specs but surely
>>>> worth a try, ..
>>>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:36, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think the feature request would not go to FileMaker, Inc. But
>>>>> rather to the VOIP app manufacturers. The problem would be though
>>>>> how to choose which app to send the request to (although, at this
>>>>> point I have none). I do not see this whole thing very unlikely,
>>>>> though, especially with the multitasking on iPad coming up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>
>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Fletcher <lists@[Protected]
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Feature request!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another
>>>>>>> app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be
>>>>>>> brilliant...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone
>>>>>>>> capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will
>>>>>>>> instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and
>>>>>>>> indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel
>>>>>>>> like they can charge more. IMHO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been
>>>>>>>> asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled
>>>>>>>> that it's not $99!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> j.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmmm...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to
>>>>>>>>> end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if
>>>>>>>>> it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would
>>>>>>>>> have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen
>>>>>>>>> for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have
>>>>>>>>> hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad
>>>>>>>>> and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in
>>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for
>>>>>>>>> different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see
>>>>>>>>> a reason that the apps should have different prices for
>>>>>>>>> different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may
>>>>>>>>>> like that!
>>>>>>>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the
>>>>>>>>>> software ;-)
>>>>>>>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480
>>>>>>>>>> resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething
>>>>>>>>>> monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of
>>>>>>>>>> Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging
>>>>>>>>>> extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for
>>>>>>>>>> each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology
>>>>>>>>>> being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk,
>>>>>>>>>> table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem
>>>>>>>>>> reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form
>>>>>>>>>> factors?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> ForNow
>>>>>>>>>> DigitEL
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> This list is a free service of LassoSoft: http://
>>>>>>> www.LassoSoft.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Browse/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> Your Frequent FM Talker
> Pavle Ancevski Pajo
> New York Hotel Trades Council
> fmtalk@[Protected]

Agi,
do you have a beta testers, and if you don't, I would like to try it, and see what and how different it is from what I am using.
Let me know.

On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:

> My plug-In, aside from dialing out, shows Skype user status, as well as receives incoming calls in FileMaker. It is still in beta though. :-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Agnes Riley
> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>
> http://www.zerobluetech.com
> T 201-293-5828
>
> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>
>
> On Aug 2, 2010, at 9:58 AM, FM Talk <fmtalk@[Protected]> wrote:
>
>> Nice touch on that one, infortica.
>> I was using the callto function with Skype for a long time, but always in connection with Applescript. Now, Applescript not being supported on iPad will become an issue for that solution to work. You way is more elegant. Good one.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 1:27 PM, info@[Protected] wrote:
>>
>>> I understand but you can get FM Pro to dial Skype merely by using a
>>> simple web viewer an script, ..
>>> simply set a field (global) to a specific value,
>>>
>>> something like this, ..
>>>
>>> Let([tel=Filter(AdrCom::contact;"0123456789+")];
>>> "callto:"&tel)
>>>
>>> this field is displayed in web viewer window (1px by 1px)
>>> this should trigger yr Skype app
>>>
>>> tested on windows computers using fm 9, 10 and 11)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:58, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>
>>>> For FM I made a plug-in to dial through Skype, but, of course, plug-
>>>> in cannot be used on FM Go.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>
>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>
>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:44 AM, "info@[Protected]"
>>>> <info@[Protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On FileMaker Pro I use the webviewer to dial a phonenumber (skype)
>>>>> - didn't go into too much detail yet on FM GO specs but surely
>>>>> worth a try, ..
>>>>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:36, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the feature request would not go to FileMaker, Inc. But
>>>>>> rather to the VOIP app manufacturers. The problem would be though
>>>>>> how to choose which app to send the request to (although, at this
>>>>>> point I have none). I do not see this whole thing very unlikely,
>>>>>> though, especially with the multitasking on iPad coming up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Fletcher <lists@[Protected]
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Feature request!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another
>>>>>>>> app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be
>>>>>>>> brilliant...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone
>>>>>>>>> capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will
>>>>>>>>> instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and
>>>>>>>>> indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel
>>>>>>>>> like they can charge more. IMHO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been
>>>>>>>>> asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled
>>>>>>>>> that it's not $99!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> j.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to
>>>>>>>>>> end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if
>>>>>>>>>> it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would
>>>>>>>>>> have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen
>>>>>>>>>> for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have
>>>>>>>>>> hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad
>>>>>>>>>> and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in
>>>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for
>>>>>>>>>> different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see
>>>>>>>>>> a reason that the apps should have different prices for
>>>>>>>>>> different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may
>>>>>>>>>>> like that!
>>>>>>>>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the
>>>>>>>>>>> software ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480
>>>>>>>>>>> resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething
>>>>>>>>>>> monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of
>>>>>>>>>>> Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging
>>>>>>>>>>> extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for
>>>>>>>>>>> each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology
>>>>>>>>>>> being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk,
>>>>>>>>>>> table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem
>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form
>>>>>>>>>>> factors?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> ForNow
>>>>>>>>>>> DigitEL
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> This list is a free service of LassoSoft: http://
>>>>>>>> www.LassoSoft.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Browse/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Your Frequent FM Talker
>> Pavle Ancevski Pajo
>> New York Hotel Trades Council
>> fmtalk@[Protected]
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>

Your Frequent FM Talker
Pavle Ancevski Pajo
New York Hotel Trades Council
fmtalk@[Protected]

You know you can get a copy. :-) But it is not for distribution, please don't share it with anyone. I have no documentation yet, so I gotta show you how to set it up. Plus it hasn't been tested on FM 11 yet.

Chat me later and we can arrange things. :-)

Oh and what are you using now?

Agi

Regards,

Agnes Riley
FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer

http://www.zerobluetech.com
T 201-293-5828

Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
Member, FileMaker Technical Network

On Aug 2, 2010, at 12:07 PM, FM Talk <fmtalk@[Protected]> wrote:

> Agi,
> do you have a beta testers, and if you don't, I would like to try it, and see what and how different it is from what I am using.
> Let me know.
>
> On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>
>> My plug-In, aside from dialing out, shows Skype user status, as well as receives incoming calls in FileMaker. It is still in beta though. :-)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Agnes Riley
>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>
>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>> T 201-293-5828
>>
>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2010, at 9:58 AM, FM Talk <fmtalk@[Protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice touch on that one, infortica.
>>> I was using the callto function with Skype for a long time, but always in connection with Applescript. Now, Applescript not being supported on iPad will become an issue for that solution to work. You way is more elegant. Good one.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 1:27 PM, info@[Protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>> I understand but you can get FM Pro to dial Skype merely by using a
>>>> simple web viewer an script, ..
>>>> simply set a field (global) to a specific value,
>>>>
>>>> something like this, ..
>>>>
>>>> Let([tel=Filter(AdrCom::contact;"0123456789+")];
>>>> "callto:"&tel)
>>>>
>>>> this field is displayed in web viewer window (1px by 1px)
>>>> this should trigger yr Skype app
>>>>
>>>> tested on windows computers using fm 9, 10 and 11)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:58, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For FM I made a plug-in to dial through Skype, but, of course, plug-
>>>>> in cannot be used on FM Go.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>
>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:44 AM, "info@[Protected]"
>>>>> <info@[Protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On FileMaker Pro I use the webviewer to dial a phonenumber (skype)
>>>>>> - didn't go into too much detail yet on FM GO specs but surely
>>>>>> worth a try, ..
>>>>>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:36, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the feature request would not go to FileMaker, Inc. But
>>>>>>> rather to the VOIP app manufacturers. The problem would be though
>>>>>>> how to choose which app to send the request to (although, at this
>>>>>>> point I have none). I do not see this whole thing very unlikely,
>>>>>>> though, especially with the multitasking on iPad coming up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Fletcher <lists@[Protected]
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Feature request!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another
>>>>>>>>> app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be
>>>>>>>>> brilliant...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone
>>>>>>>>>> capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will
>>>>>>>>>> instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and
>>>>>>>>>> indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel
>>>>>>>>>> like they can charge more. IMHO.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been
>>>>>>>>>> asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled
>>>>>>>>>> that it's not $99!!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> j.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to
>>>>>>>>>>> end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if
>>>>>>>>>>> it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would
>>>>>>>>>>> have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen
>>>>>>>>>>> for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have
>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad
>>>>>>>>>>> and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in
>>>>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for
>>>>>>>>>>> different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see
>>>>>>>>>>> a reason that the apps should have different prices for
>>>>>>>>>>> different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may
>>>>>>>>>>>> like that!
>>>>>>>>>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the
>>>>>>>>>>>> software ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480
>>>>>>>>>>>> resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething
>>>>>>>>>>>> monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging
>>>>>>>>>>>> extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for
>>>>>>>>>>>> each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology
>>>>>>>>>>>> being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk,
>>>>>>>>>>>> table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem
>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form
>>>>>>>>>>>> factors?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> ForNow
>>>>>>>>>>>> DigitEL
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> This list is a free service of LassoSoft: http://
>>>>>>>>> www.LassoSoft.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Browse/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your Frequent FM Talker
>>> Pavle Ancevski Pajo
>>> New York Hotel Trades Council
>>> fmtalk@[Protected]
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> Your Frequent FM Talker
> Pavle Ancevski Pajo
> New York Hotel Trades Council
> fmtalk@[Protected]

> You know you can get a copy. :-) But it is not for distribution, please don't share it with anyone. I have no documentation yet, so I gotta show you how to set it up. Plus it hasn't been tested on FM 11 yet.
>
I understand. I can see if it's gonna work on it.


> Chat me later and we can arrange things. :-)
I will

>
> Oh and what are you using now?

FM11A, but my solution was working on old eMacs and iMacs with OS10.4 and FM10 with Applescript and earlier version of Skype (not the recent one, since it was not compatible with the OS). The reason, we got 20 comps for phonebanking and a lot of them were used comps, some office wanted to throw away.We maxed the memory, and OS, and voila, FM10, Applescript, Skype, and we got phonebanking in function, with almost no cost (except for Skype credits, and electricity, of course). Volunteers were/are doing the phonebanking, lol.


Pajo

>
> Agi
>
> Regards,
>
> Agnes Riley
> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>
> http://www.zerobluetech.com
> T 201-293-5828
>
> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>
> On Aug 2, 2010, at 12:07 PM, FM Talk <fmtalk@[Protected]> wrote:
>
>> Agi,
>> do you have a beta testers, and if you don't, I would like to try it, and see what and how different it is from what I am using.
>> Let me know.
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>
>>> My plug-In, aside from dialing out, shows Skype user status, as well as receives incoming calls in FileMaker. It is still in beta though. :-)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Agnes Riley
>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>
>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>
>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 2, 2010, at 9:58 AM, FM Talk <fmtalk@[Protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice touch on that one, infortica.
>>>> I was using the callto function with Skype for a long time, but always in connection with Applescript. Now, Applescript not being supported on iPad will become an issue for that solution to work. You way is more elegant. Good one.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 1:27 PM, info@[Protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I understand but you can get FM Pro to dial Skype merely by using a
>>>>> simple web viewer an script, ..
>>>>> simply set a field (global) to a specific value,
>>>>>
>>>>> something like this, ..
>>>>>
>>>>> Let([tel=Filter(AdrCom::contact;"0123456789+")];
>>>>> "callto:"&tel)
>>>>>
>>>>> this field is displayed in web viewer window (1px by 1px)
>>>>> this should trigger yr Skype app
>>>>>
>>>>> tested on windows computers using fm 9, 10 and 11)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:58, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> For FM I made a plug-in to dial through Skype, but, of course, plug-
>>>>>> in cannot be used on FM Go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:44 AM, "info@[Protected]"
>>>>>> <info@[Protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On FileMaker Pro I use the webviewer to dial a phonenumber (skype)
>>>>>>> - didn't go into too much detail yet on FM GO specs but surely
>>>>>>> worth a try, ..
>>>>>>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:36, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think the feature request would not go to FileMaker, Inc. But
>>>>>>>> rather to the VOIP app manufacturers. The problem would be though
>>>>>>>> how to choose which app to send the request to (although, at this
>>>>>>>> point I have none). I do not see this whole thing very unlikely,
>>>>>>>> though, especially with the multitasking on iPad coming up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Fletcher <lists@[Protected]
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Feature request!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another
>>>>>>>>>> app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be
>>>>>>>>>> brilliant...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone
>>>>>>>>>>> capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will
>>>>>>>>>>> instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and
>>>>>>>>>>> indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel
>>>>>>>>>>> like they can charge more. IMHO.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been
>>>>>>>>>>> asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled
>>>>>>>>>>> that it's not $99!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> j.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to
>>>>>>>>>>>> end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if
>>>>>>>>>>>> it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would
>>>>>>>>>>>> have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen
>>>>>>>>>>>> for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have
>>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad
>>>>>>>>>>>> and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in
>>>>>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for
>>>>>>>>>>>> different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see
>>>>>>>>>>>> a reason that the apps should have different prices for
>>>>>>>>>>>> different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may
>>>>>>>>>>>>> like that!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> software ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480
>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething
>>>>>>>>>>>>> monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging
>>>>>>>>>>>>> extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology
>>>>>>>>>>>>> being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form
>>>>>>>>>>>>> factors?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ForNow
>>>>>>>>>>>>> DigitEL
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> This list is a free service of LassoSoft: http://
>>>>>>>>>> www.LassoSoft.com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Browse/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your Frequent FM Talker
>>>> Pavle Ancevski Pajo
>>>> New York Hotel Trades Council
>>>> fmtalk@[Protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Your Frequent FM Talker
>> Pavle Ancevski Pajo
>> New York Hotel Trades Council
>> fmtalk@[Protected]
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>

Your Frequent FM Talker
Pavle Ancevski Pajo
New York Hotel Trades Council
fmtalk@[Protected]

Wow, you guys still know how to skin cats, ;-)

Ok, message me when you can.

Agnes B. Riley
FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
ariley@[Protected]
ZeroBlue Technology Solutions

Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
Member, FileMaker Technical Network

FileMaker Advanced 10.3 and 11.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.3

"Imagination is more important than knowledge..."
/Albert Einstein/




On Aug 2, 2010, at 2:26 PM, FM Talk wrote:

>
>> You know you can get a copy. :-) But it is not for distribution, please don't share it with anyone. I have no documentation yet, so I gotta show you how to set it up. Plus it hasn't been tested on FM 11 yet.
>>
> I understand. I can see if it's gonna work on it.
>
>
>> Chat me later and we can arrange things. :-)
> I will
>
>>
>> Oh and what are you using now?
>
> FM11A, but my solution was working on old eMacs and iMacs with OS10.4 and FM10 with Applescript and earlier version of Skype (not the recent one, since it was not compatible with the OS). The reason, we got 20 comps for phonebanking and a lot of them were used comps, some office wanted to throw away.We maxed the memory, and OS, and voila, FM10, Applescript, Skype, and we got phonebanking in function, with almost no cost (except for Skype credits, and electricity, of course). Volunteers were/are doing the phonebanking, lol.
>
>
> Pajo
>
>>
>> Agi
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Agnes Riley
>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>
>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>> T 201-293-5828
>>
>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2010, at 12:07 PM, FM Talk <fmtalk@[Protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Agi,
>>> do you have a beta testers, and if you don't, I would like to try it, and see what and how different it is from what I am using.
>>> Let me know.
>>>
>>> On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>
>>>> My plug-In, aside from dialing out, shows Skype user status, as well as receives incoming calls in FileMaker. It is still in beta though. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>
>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>
>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 2, 2010, at 9:58 AM, FM Talk <fmtalk@[Protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nice touch on that one, infortica.
>>>>> I was using the callto function with Skype for a long time, but always in connection with Applescript. Now, Applescript not being supported on iPad will become an issue for that solution to work. You way is more elegant. Good one.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 1:27 PM, info@[Protected] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I understand but you can get FM Pro to dial Skype merely by using a
>>>>>> simple web viewer an script, ..
>>>>>> simply set a field (global) to a specific value,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> something like this, ..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let([tel=Filter(AdrCom::contact;"0123456789+")];
>>>>>> "callto:"&tel)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this field is displayed in web viewer window (1px by 1px)
>>>>>> this should trigger yr Skype app
>>>>>>
>>>>>> tested on windows computers using fm 9, 10 and 11)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:58, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For FM I made a plug-in to dial through Skype, but, of course, plug-
>>>>>>> in cannot be used on FM Go.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:44 AM, "info@[Protected]"
>>>>>>> <info@[Protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On FileMaker Pro I use the webviewer to dial a phonenumber (skype)
>>>>>>>> - didn't go into too much detail yet on FM GO specs but surely
>>>>>>>> worth a try, ..
>>>>>>>> On 31 Jul 2010, at 17:36, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think the feature request would not go to FileMaker, Inc. But
>>>>>>>>> rather to the VOIP app manufacturers. The problem would be though
>>>>>>>>> how to choose which app to send the request to (although, at this
>>>>>>>>> point I have none). I do not see this whole thing very unlikely,
>>>>>>>>> though, especially with the multitasking on iPad coming up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Fletcher <lists@[Protected]
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Feature request!!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Agnes Riley wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Now, if the 'dial phone' script step could dial through another
>>>>>>>>>>> app installed on your iPad, such as Skype, that would be
>>>>>>>>>>> brilliant...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Agnes Riley
>>>>>>>>>>> FileMaker 10 and 11 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.zerobluetech.com
>>>>>>>>>>> T 201-293-5828
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Business Alliance
>>>>>>>>>>> Member, FileMaker Technical Network
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> , code-wise. For instance, if the iPad ever gets phone
>>>>>>>>>>>> capability, I'll bet that the Dial Phone script step will
>>>>>>>>>>>> instantly just work on the iPad as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm with Steve: it's just marketing. The perceived value--and
>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed the usefulness--is greater on the iPad, so they feel
>>>>>>>>>>>> like they can charge more. IMHO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, however, a thin client for $40? Wow! Haven't we been
>>>>>>>>>>>> asking for something like that for decades? I'm just tickled
>>>>>>>>>>>> that it's not $99!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> j.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Steve Cassidy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Digitel, if you scale up from iphone to wall, you are going to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> end up with icons the size of picture frames...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surely this is not a question of simple scaling? And even if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it were, it would mean that everything on your layout would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to be some kind of vector graphic so it would scale nicely.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The point, though, is that you've got room on an iphone screen
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for about two buttons, while on a wall you could have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds. Plus of course the difference between mouse/trackpad
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and touchscreen, though this may be of less importance in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you are always going to have to design differently for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> different screen sizes. On the other hand, I'm not sure I see
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a reason that the apps should have different prices for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> different sizes. Probably that's just marketing...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:11 AM, DigitEL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jonathan... I'll run that by my clients... they may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like that!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I point out, however, that is due more to the device than the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> software ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Point being I have clients who started out with 640x480
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolution and now they use upwards of 1400xsomething
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monitors and have been very appreciative of the genius of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nashoba design providing the zoom widget without FM charging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extra for the ability. Can you imagine doubling the price for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each zoom increment, great gig if you could get it ;-p
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify, I have heard ideas of the iOS technology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being scaled up to large wall size units with tabloid, desk,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> table, and other sized models in between. Does it seem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable to scale up the price for each of these form
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> factors?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ForNow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DigitEL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>>>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> This list is a free service of LassoSoft: http://
>>>>>>>>>>> www.LassoSoft.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Fletcher
>>>>>>>>>> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fletcher Data Consulting
>>>>>>>>>> jonathan@[Protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.fletcherdata.com
>>>>>>>>>> 502-509-7137
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
>>>>>>>>>> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
>>>>>>>>>> Next meeting:
>>>>>>>>>> 8/12/10 1:00 pm
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Browse/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your Frequent FM Talker
>>>>> Pavle Ancevski Pajo
>>>>> New York Hotel Trades Council
>>>>> fmtalk@[Protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your Frequent FM Talker
>>> Pavle Ancevski Pajo
>>> New York Hotel Trades Council
>>> fmtalk@[Protected]
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> Your Frequent FM Talker
> Pavle Ancevski Pajo
> New York Hotel Trades Council
> fmtalk@[Protected]